Each individual file can be grouped within a file-set, such as floor, building or discipline.Īccess rights can be assigned to individual files or complete file-sets to restrict unauthorised access to other people's data. Each project consists of thousands of drawing files containing building elements such as walls, stairs and columns all of which are stored in individual files. AllPlan and Revit, but they approach and tackle these issues in quite different ways.ĭata structure The entire AllPlan suite is project-based, which means that any drawing or design, however simple, has to be assigned to a project. This is to erase the discontinuity associated with working in multiple environments, to develop, store and coordinate all of the project information in the same integrated environment. The design process Before we look at how the models are structured and how they perform, we must first remind ourselves of the motivation behind the single building model approach. Revit requires a minimum screen resolution of 1024 x 768.
Limited to a maximum screen resolution of 800 x 600, I was unable to access all of the allegedly 'available' tools. This would not have been such an issue had I not used my trusty laptop to review the software.
Again, screen real estate is maximised by having the same context-sensitive menus in the main menu but, unlike AllPlan, Revit does not currently enable users to customise the toolbars. The discipline-specific tools in AllPlan are swapped for workflow-related tools in Revit. Revit's interface works in a similar way.
Nemetschek allplan vs revit windows#
As you would expect from a Windows application, the toolbars are fully customizable. The working area therefore remains clutter-free. Clicking on a tool set loads the relevant icons in the main menu at the top of the screen. The architectural module, for example, has walls, stairs, columns and roofs and so on. Inside AllPlan, the interface is refreshingly simple and is divided into disciplinespecific modules. However, the interface is your window into the heart of the application, and the simpler the layout of the tools, the more intuitive the application will be to use. The interface Just as you should not judge a book by its cover, a pretty interface does not immediately mean you have a top-quality tool in your hands. Although it has few users so far, the numbers are growing, due in part to Revit's 'early-adopter'programme, which offers discounts to a select few whose names will market well. Developed specifically for the architectural market, Revit does not contain tools for other disciplines such as HVAC or structural design. AllPlan FT sports a suite of discipline-specific products for architecture, engineering, landscaping, planning and finite-element analysis.Ĭonversely, the Revit Technology Corporation is new to Europe and was only launched in the US in May this year. The companies Nemetschek is widely respected across Europe, with many thousands of bums on seats in the AEC industry.